|
|
|
Cosmology
|
|
The concept of cosmology
|
|
•Cosmology is the study the variety of being
|
|
Variety includes particular
entities which includes thing, relationship, process, origins and ends of
manifest being; and abstract objects including the mathematical and logical
objects as well as the ethical such as value and justice. Truth straddles the
ethical and the actual
|
|
Variety
|
|
The earlier discussion of
variety in Metaphysics is adequate
|
|
Process
|
|
Mechanism
|
|
Origin of non-ephemeral or
quasi-stable system whose stability is a function of ‘near’ symmetry by
incremental variation and selection is a reasonable ‘mechanism’
|
|
Incremental process may
occur, as in life on this earth, by selection in already quasi-stable
populations. It may also occur as in a hypothetical cosmological case as the
occasional near stable cosmos from among ephemeral ones. In this case the
increment is over states rather than populations
|
|
Local dynamics may emerge in
the same processes
|
|
By the fundamental principle
incremental variation and selection it is a necessary mechanism in that it
must occur in some cases
|
|
By the fundamental
principle, ‘saltation’ or single step origins must also occur
|
|
The incremental variation
and selection described above is at most Normal or (highly) probable
|
|
In general, origins may
include the saltation as well as the incremental
|
|
It is often thought that
indeterminism cannot result in structure. However, absolute indeterminism
must result in structure—this is contained in the concept of absolute
indeterminism (no inaccessible states as required by the fundamental
principle.) The ‘mechanisms’ of emergence are as above—incremental andor
saltational
|
|
Causation
|
|
Causation is an aspect of
dynamics and therefore not universal—unless, of course, causation is given an
interpretation other than the one in which the caused is a strong function of
the cause. In such an alternative interpretation, it may be said that the
Void ‘causes’ the manifest universe
|
|
Space, time and being
|
|
Even though we intuit only
space and time, there may perhaps be non-intuitive modes of displacement
other than space and time
|
|
However, it appears
intuitively that being is not further analyzable with regard to displacement.
Further we have found no necessity of further modes thus far. This suggests
that there are no further modes of displacement. Alternatively, it reveals
the limits of our intuition / variety of our cosmological system
|
|
Manifest being appears to be
characterized by extension and duration. However, the measures of extension
and duration may be patchy and (as in quantum gravitation) ‘foamy’
|
|
There appears to be no
logical preference for any dimensionality of space. However, non-logical
considerations, e.g., of complexity, stability, and emergence of sentience
may select for certain dimensionalities
|
|
In this cosmos, time appears
to be locally ‘universal.’ This is perhaps the result of selection. More
generally, in a weakly correlated system there may be more than one time.
Multiple times could be localized or strongly correlated within a weak
correlation. Dimensionality of time appears be to fundamentally different
than dimensionality of space
|
|
The foregoing suggests an
explanation for the meaning and possibility of origins of time and
space—i.e., of more or less coherent space-times
|
|
As noted earlier, any
universal time and space are immanent and therefore relative. There is
nothing that excludes this logically relative character to occasionally
manifest as absolute. Further, there may be absolute space and time in
limited domains
|
|
Local / physical
cosmology
|
|
There are clear mutual
implications among the Universal metaphysics and the study of the physics of
the local cosmological system including the study of the fundamental forces,
force—gravitation-matter-space-time, and the quantum vacuum and quantum theory
|
|
Such studies have not yet
been taken up but may be an aspect of the ‘experiments’
|
|
The present development has
considered implications for the extent of the Universe, the origin of the
laws of this cosmos and their non-universal character, the non-origination
and non-ending of the Universe, recurrence, annihilation, the relative character
of any space-time for the entire Universe, the necessity of both relative and
absolute space-times for local systems, the possibility but general
improbability of entirely saltational origins of local cosmological systems,
an incomplete loss of information in transitions through the Void state,
universal interaction, the origins—and possibility and meaning of origins—of
Laws and of space-time, and the non-universal character of the speed of
propagation of the fundamental forces
|
|
When light is regarded as an
isolated phenomenon the fundamental character of its speed in this cosmos may
seem puzzling. However the ‘speed of light’ is the speed of propagation of
all fundamental forces of this cosmos and is therefore bound into the
very constitution of the elements of this cosmos
|
|
Mind
|
|
•Experience is the first characteristic of mind
|
|
The question is not ‘what is
mind?’ There is no question. Asking this question reflects misunderstanding
of the nature of mind. Experience has been seen to be at the center of our
‘personal’ universes—the being of those slightly metaphorical universes. An
explanation of experience is not to be sought in something else for
experience is at the center. Attitude and action which have been regarded as
definitive of mind along with experience may be seen as experience together
with secondary modes. Below, the character of experience will be extended and
Experience will be seen to extend to the root of being
|
|
In a local cosmological
system, mind may emerge in the following ways. (1) Spontaneously, (2)
Emergence from material elements, and (3) Import from another part of the
Universe
|
|
The second case is, on first
reflection, perhaps most likely and stable; it is perhaps the Normal case. In
this case, mind must already extend to the ‘material’ elements; however,
higher mind will emerge by organization and layering. Human (animal) consciousness
will be layered, reflexive, multiple, with degrees of focus; thus there may
be apparent awareness without consciousness but this is awareness without
central consciousness; thus, consciousness may be appear to be on-off but it
is the aspect of reflexivity / focus that is on-off. However, human (animal)
consciousness will not be categorially distinct from, e.g., the internal
adjustment of one fundamental particle to another
|
|
In cases, (1) and (3) mind
may be locally dual to the already established material elements. Due to such
elements superposed on the Normal case, Normal mind may reach down to the
elements of being and the duality may merge into a local monism. Even in the
Normal case, true creativity requires indeterministic elements (by the
definition of ‘new’) or, more likely, the interaction of the indeterministic
and the structured. The ‘creativity’ of indeterministic process and the
necessity of such process as part of creativity are discussed above in
Mechanism
|
|
In the Universe, case (3),
above is logically excluded. However, since (1) may play a role similar to
(3), the Universal case is not fundamentally different from the local case in
its possibilities for mind
|
|
Phenomena as object
binding—how and why the shape, color and so on of an entity are perceived as
one, object constancy—how an entity appears to be the same entity from
different angles and distances and under some different lighting, and ‘unity
of consciousness’ are explanatory problems from the point of view of
neurobiology and the idea that the perceptual object is the sum of the
perceptual parts. However, entities come first in a sense and the entities or
objects of our world are those in terms of which we adapt. Therefore, unity
of consciousness and so on require no explanation; such ‘phenomena’
have an intuitively primary character
|
|
These thoughts are not
against explanation or its uses but show the relative character of its
necessity to understanding
|
|
Principles of thought and
action
|
|
Treated in Method,
these are principles of construction—creation—of fruitful ideas, concepts and
theories. They are somewhat distinct from ‘method’ but have application to
method, and in criticism. They are especially applicable to cosmology
|