Exclamation!
>> So many intelligent people from the history of ideas and so many ideas—but I have seen deeper than all in all ideas (in very central ways though not in all ways)…
>> But
not only that, I have seen as deep as can be seen
… and though I’ve used science as suggestive, this could not come from science
as it is taken to be (even though in another sense, it is science)
>> And as deep as is?
>> Why? My greatest talents—perseverance and humility (despite of course the ever present ego-story.) Humility? I don’t mean self-effacing I’m nothing kind of humility, I just mean the humility of ever present no matter how much I’ve seen, there may be error and there may be more… and humility about the humility which means being open to seeing that I’ve seen which, too, is necessary and not merely honesty etc.
But remember
>> The theory itself shows that this accessible to anyone—except pathology but actually even including pathology if the assumption of the normal case is relinquished
Except of course
>> Art… and so on and here, too, I suspect (hope?) that it’s too much of something (an aspect of ‘left brain’ etc) and not too little of something