Journey in Being—A Way of Discovery and
Realization
Anil
Mitra
Home
Contents
Introduction. 2
Foundation. 2
Meaning. 2
Existence. 4
Experience. 4
Being. 5
Universe. 5
Law.. 5
Void. 6
A Fundamental Principle. 6
Substance. 6
Metaphysics. 6
Logic. 6
Logos. 7
Identity, Power, and
Cosmology. 7
Mind and Matter 7
Individual 8
Journey. 8
Freedom.. 8
Psychology. 8
Civilization. 8
Disciplines. 9
Method. 9
Realization. 10
The Way. 10
Program.. 11
Introduction. 11
Ideas. 12
Individual Transformation. 12
Transformation of
Civilization. 13
Transformation via Artifact 14
A Brief Version of the
Program with Timelines. 14
Journey in Being—A Way
of Discovery and Realization
To know and approach highest ideals requires action
informed by understanding the Universe as a whole. This ideal primes a
journey in being
In the history of human civilization various
disciplines and endeavors arise. These provide knowledge methods—a method is
the ‘how’ of doing something but, in general, it does not guarantee a
positive outcome—for various kinds of activity. At a higher level we may realize
methods for development of the disciplines—e.g., the scientific method. Such
methods may appear to be received but evolve in interaction with the specific
activities
Is there ideal or method to the whole enterprise? A
methods and ideals stand outside the enterprise to which they refer. At the highest
level there is no above or outside. This suggests there is no universal
method. We might as well ask whether the Universe has a method. However, any
real answer to the question will require some understanding of the Universe
as a whole
Our first objective is to study Being. Meaning is
important because it is medium and means of understanding. It includes
linguistic meaning. Since our intent is study of the Universe, we focus on referential
meaning as the instrument of study (we can incorporate ‘non-referential
meaning’ as an element of the study or perhaps by finding objects that are
implicit in explicitly non-referential constructs). In the following
‘meaning’ will mean ‘referential meaning’
We use ‘concept’ to refer to mental content. The idea of
concept as, e.g., ‘unit of meaning’ is a sub case. Percepts are concepts
A concept is an association of icons and non-iconic
signs. For a concept to refer, it must have iconic content. Non-iconic signs
acquire iconic character—and iconic signs acquire further iconic character—(a)
in association with iconic elements—thus the abstraction and efficiency of
language—and (b) by their arrangement (e.g. sentences)
Reference carries projection; thus the very concept of
an object is in question. However, we will find cases of (a) perfection in
which projective contribution is eliminated by abstraction only of what is
effectively untouched such contribution and, later, (b) practical objects
that are good enough in some pragmatic sense
A concept and its object constitute the meaning of the
concept or associated word-sign
In normal affairs it is natural and efficient to
conflate concept and object
The significance of this concept of meaning is that the
distinction of concept and object is essential to the clear understanding of
meaning, elimination of obscurity, vagueness and paradox. We find that
experience is incorporated in meaning and the advance of meaning, i.e.
analysis of meaning is profoundly and simultaneously empirical and conceptual
What is the nature of a concept in itself, i.e. as part
of the Universe? Concepts have been seen as mental and as abstract ‘objects’.
However, these cases will later be ruled out and it will be found that
concepts are just things in the world (they are at least and in some sense
organizations within the brain and perhaps entire body)
Thus the idea of the concept harbors self-reference
which can be a source of paradox. However, this is not the only source of
paradox nor is it necessarily a source of paradox. The sources of paradox lie
in the naïve expectation that concepts will do what they inherently do not
do. Three sources of paradox are (1) implicit reference, i.e. reference that
is not explicit in the concept (2) the freedom to form illogical concepts (3)
assumption that the form of reference entails reference
For determinateness, meaning is ultimately not to be
founded in further meanings—as it is in a dictionary—but in context and use.
Context and use provide appropriate balance between stability and fluidity of
meaning and knowledge. In a stable context meaning is stabilized in use;
variations may be accommodated but if too severe they are likely to be
rejected. In a changing context the severe variations are adaptive and may be
selected by the process itself or, in special situations, by cognition
Thus (i) Study of meaning is not mere lexical meaning
but the study of the nature of objects, already empirical, and, when analyzed
in relation to changing or formation of contexts; such study and development
of meaning will be called ‘analysis of meaning’. This will be seen to be an
immensely important aspect of the method of all knowledge, especially of the
metaphysics to be developed. If we admit seeking consequences and experiment
into analysis of meaning—they are already implicitly present—then, with
appropriate interpretation, the foregoing analysis already includes
scientific method (ii) Analysis of meaning may be deployed in resolution of
numerous significant and minor paradoxes
Existence marks what is there
It is the most elementary of distinctions
Since ‘everything’ exists, existence has been called
trivial
However, ‘the tiger exists’ means, from the analysis of
meaning, ‘there is something that corresponds to the concept of tiger’. Since
I can conceive ‘things’ that do not exist, existence is not entirely trivial.
However, it is trivial enough and it will be seen that this triviality is a source
of power of the concept
‘Unicorns do not exist’. That sentence appears to lack
meaning for if they do not exist what does ‘unicorn’ mean. This has been
called the problem of negative existence or of the non-existent object. The
resolution in terms of the foregoing analysis of meaning is trivial.
‘Unicorns do not exist’ means ‘There is no thing that correspond to the
concept of ‘Unicorn’’
The idea of experience begins as the aware part of
awareness, i.e. consciousness
In western thought the name of Descartes is connected
to the intimate connection between ‘being’ and experience
From materialism many thinkers have denied or minimized
experience
Analysis of the meaning of (the concept of)
matter—regardless of its reality—shows that the exclusion of experience is
not an essential part of it for absence of mention does not mean absence in
fact. The idea that matter excludes experience (mind) is a prejudice or
alternatively an example of the ‘fallacy of misplaced concreteness’
Experience (though not its putative content) is a
primary fact of our ‘being’. Though not everything it is the place of
significance. It is metaphorically our lens or aperture on the world.
Metaphorically and in hyperbole we may say that experience is our world. If
we are to be neutral to commitment at outset we should allow that the
apparent metaphor is more than metaphor. We will find this to be the case
‘Experience’ names this primary fact of experience. It
is given and named; it is named experience. In experience we know that there
is a world and there is experience; for if it is all illusion then there is
still experience for illusion is experience; and the world is then made up of
illusion
That the world is rich we do not doubt; we know this
from the rich variety of experience
The extreme regarding the illusory nature of the world
is the solipsistic view that ‘all is experience’. However, from a degree
richness which is properly inferred but not directly known in experience we
conclude that ‘all is experience’ is either (a) a renaming of a world that is
real or (b) contradictory
There is therefore a real world (which is rich and
which is known in and contains experience)
But the question ‘precisely what exists’ has hardly
been answered. We know that there is a rich real world and that experience is
real. However we do not yet know that the objects of everyday experience and
science—for example—as we experience them are real for all purposes even
though they are real enough. We now take up the implied project
Being is that which is—i.e. which exists of has existence
The ideas of Being and existence have been distinguished,
e.g. Being is that which exists-in-itself. However, the metaphysics to be
established will show that this distinction is empty
The power of the concept of Being is its triviality and
neutrality. It makes no ontological commitment to kind or substance e.g., to
concrete and abstract kinds; to entity, process, property; mind, matter, and
spirit; it makes no epistemological to commitment or lack of commitment. It
allows kinds and commitment to emerge. It is a neutral container for what
emerges from in-process justification. The neutrality of Being includes that
the ‘is’ in ‘that which is’ may but does not necessarily refer to any
particular region in time and space or other distinction or to the givenness
or universality of such distinctions. That is—Being is the most trivial of
concepts and its power lies in its triviality
The world is known in experience, i.e. in concept
Concepts may define perfect objects
Being and experience in itself are perfect
There is Being
It is the triviality of Being that permits its synthetic
definition and given character, i.e. it is not necessary to postulate that
there is Being
In experience we know the richness and reality of the
world
The Universe is All Being
The significance of this
conception is that it eliminates vagueness without introducing premature
over-specification—especially of scientific and mythic metaphysics and
cosmologies
‘All Being’ connotes Being across all distinctions
including measure—e.g. extension and duration—and variety
The Universe has no outside or boundary or other or
greater
The Universe was not created. There are no Gods outside of
or creator to the Universe. Any Gods are in the Universe
A Law is a pattern. All Laws have Being—else they would be
outside the Universe
The Universe contains all Laws
The Void which is the absence of Being contains no Laws
If the Void had a limit that would be a Law
Therefore the Void and—consequently—the Universe have no
limits
To repeat—
The Universe has no limits—i.e., no limits with regard to
distinction
This conclusion, the fundamental principle of
metaphysics or FP,
is found—shortly—to be basis to a perfect, unique, and ultimate system of
knowledge (metaphysics) of the Universe
The meaning of FP will continue to emerge in what follows
From FP,
the Void—therefore any state—is equivalent to any state including the
Universe
I.e. FP
founds the Universe in the Void or any one of its states. This is a non
relative foundation without substance or need for substance. The foundation
is explicitly ultimate in depth
Further, every state is implicit in this foundation. I.e.
the foundation is implicitly ultimate in capturing breadth or variety of
Being
I.e. the Universe has no substance and needs no substance
for understanding
Thus the foundation is ultimate—in depth and breadth—and
shows the Universe itself to be ultimate; the foundation is Universal in this
sense
From the perfection of the basis, the foundation is
perfect
Metaphysics is knowledge—study—of Being as Being. Contrary
to centuries of doubt and rejection regarding metaphysics the foregoing
demonstrates metaphysical knowledge
Metaphysics over any domain must be unique and, except
that it may be expressed in different forms and developed in different
degrees of detail, is not subject to revision
Therefore FP is basis to a perfect, unique, and ultimate Universal
Metaphysics. From uniqueness we may refer to it as the metaphysics
Define Logic as the concept of the Universe. Then Logic is
identical to the metaphysics
Logic is not a limit but harbors all constraint on the concept
of the Universe
It is therefore the only constraint on the concept of the
Universe
Logic includes all valid explicit and tacit human
knowledge, especially valid science, logic and mathematics
Logic includes all valid knowledge
This Logic is far from empty
for it includes the sciences, logics (and mathematics) in their valid domains
In so far as they have referential
form, it includes—subject to Logic—art, literature, history, religion, the
humanities of the modern tradition; and all traditions and cultures
It includes exploration and
technology in the realms of the material, the social, the organic including
the body, the mind; these include the idea of spirit which is not another
thing but from tradition deserves mention
It is immensely greater than the valid content of the
human tradition. In breadth, the valid human tradition is a negligible
fraction of Logic
In this conception Logic is ultimate expression of freedom
The Universal Metaphysics and Logic are identical
Logos, conceived as the object of Logic, is the Universe
in all its detail
The Universe has Identity
The Universe and its Identity manifest in acute, diffuse,
and empty phases. Core identity—we do not emphasize the idea of soul—is that
which has continuity across the non-manifest phases
There are no limits to the variety, duration, and extension
of Being in the Universe
Power is degree of limitlessness. The Universe contains
all power. It is the greatest power
The Universe and its Identity manifest in unlimited
variety of ‘physical law’ and cosmological system against a greater
background that includes the transient and the Void; except logical
contradiction every event occurs on some cosmos; every cosmos has parallel
and almost parallel ‘ghost’ cosmoses with minimal interaction
The elements of physics make no reference to mind.
Therefore matter is often conceived as a substance that has no mental
elements. In this case mind must arise in the organization of matter.
However, experience is merely coincidental. Therefore matter must contain
mental elements. These may be (a) other than matter or (b) inherent to
matter—discovered or undiscovered—but not recognized as such. Mental
causation shows that mind cannot be entirely other than matter; further the distinction
at the elemental level is surely terminological (an artifact of the peculiar
way in which we naïvely experience our own minds). That the structure of mind
has correspondence to brain organization shows that physical-mental elements
include the already known-discovered. However, if physics so far is
deterministic, creativity requires that some elements of the physical-mental
are as yet undiscovered. Even if physics so far is indeterministic there may
be some yet undiscovered elements. This direction of thought provides
resolutions to (i) nature of mind and matter, i.e. as having the same root
and of primitive-macroscopic matter relation as similar to
primitive-macroscopic mind (ii) primitive mind as roughly ‘feeling’;
macroscopic mind as variety, intensity, layering of same, the bound-free
aspect (see discussion of psychology for more detail) as adaptation (iii)
problems of mind and matter, e.g. their coexistence and interaction (iv)
mental causation (v) freedom of will (i.e. of creating choice and consequent
action)
Given that mind (experience) is inherent to matter,
what is it? First, at the elemental level it is so primitive that it is not
‘experienced as experience’; i.e. human level experience is the result of
amplification, layering etc. Second from the character of experience, mind in
one element must be associated with the effect of another element. Pure
experience is possible at the elemental level because from FP, there are no
atoms, i.e. infinite divisibility. The compound case allows explanation of
numerous phenomena of mind and consciousness that are otherwise puzzling—e.g.,
the apparent on-off nature of consciousness, cases—e.g., in brain damaged
persons—of behavioral response to stimulus without awareness of the stimulus,
consciousness as focused and intense versus lower lever consciousness versus
unconsciousness as a continuum versus opposition, ‘body consciousness’ as
part of the unconscious, self-referential consciousness and language as
intensifying and enabling insight into and talk of consciousness, that it is
not consciousness-feeling as such that are adaptive (though perhaps a
sufficiently ordered cosmological background is necessary and that might have
some relation to stability and therefore population of the Universe with
stable over unstable cosmoses) but their intensification and adaptation to
environment
What is different in the Universal case? First, there
may be multiple modes of matter (which can be substantial only for limited
practical purposes). Therefore there may be multiple modes of mind. These may
arise at various levels. However, the levels are not fixed for there may be
reaching across modes and reaching up and down within modes. The variety of
phenomena is broad and includes what may appear to be ghosts and spirit
Though normally limited, individuals inherit the power,
cosmology, and Identity of the Universe
In unlimited form, realization is an act of perception and
Being. It—realization in unlimited form—is ‘Aeternitas’, i.e. eternity in a
glance. Limited form may know of this mode of realization and partake of
elements of it
In limited form, realization is an endless and ever fresh
journey in variety (distinction)
The journey is unlimited in summits, their variety and
quality, elevation and dissolutions; it is an ever-fresh process. This is one
source of the title ‘Journey in Being’. Pain is unavoidable; for itself is
neither avoided nor sought
Limited forms mesh constraint and freedom; for its value
and difficulty, discovery-expression of freedom is the greatest challenge.
Thus while realization is given, effectiveness and enjoyment require
intelligent and reflective commitment of all resources of the individual
See Journey
in Being-Essential.html
Human civilization is the continuity of humankind as an
arc in the Universe
In the human endeavor civilization and individuals are
vehicles and agents of realization
The concept of Civilization itself is the matrix of civilizations
in communication and community populating the Universe
While growth of civilization is given, effectiveness and
quality depend on intelligent and communicating use of resources
Ultimate Civilization is the Universe in its phases of
acute universal Identity
The human endeavor—culture—has disciplines and special
activities which provide methods—from rough and uncertain to algorithmic—for
classes of problem and activity
The development of the disciplines is more open ended and
experimental with regard to ideas and action. Yet method can—at least
sometimes—discerned, e.g. scientific method. This method has been contrasted
to deduction in logic. However, a more apt comparison would be to the
development of logical systems
The disciplines—which include methods—and their methods of
development, i.e. content and method, develop together
The Universal Metaphysics reveals that the ideals of
perfection in the traditional disciplines, e.g. completion in science and
Platonism in logic and mathematics, cannot be realized. There are domains of
perfection; outside the perfect moving forward requires ‘completion’ by
action, i.e. in participation and immersion
The disciplines and activities and civilization in their
standard—e.g. secular—views and manifestations reveal an infinitesimal
fraction of the Universe
What we often regard as established and received and which
generates a whole culture of guru-disciple, expert-novice, professor-student
has islands of value and definitiveness. As a whole—over the range of
endeavor or time—the definitiveness is a mirage born properly of conservatism
but improperly of economic and self-serving ego incentives
The Universal Metaphysics includes what is valid in
experience, the disciplines and endeavors; if it did not it would not be
perfect. It may be deployed to fame ‘imperfect but practical objects’ that
are effective in negotiating the known world; provides for their integration
with perfect objects; and it illuminates ‘good enough’ and ‘value’
interpretations for perfection of these objects
It would seem that the entire endeavor has no method.
Indeed the metaphysics reveals ever openness in variety (distinction).
However it has closure in foundation
That is, the ultimate nature of the metaphysics is explicit
in depth but only implicit in breadth
In the Universal Metaphysics content or subject matter and
method arise together. The content is the metaphysics itself. The method
includes analysis of meaning, abstraction whose result contains no projective
distortion, identification and naming of givens. The process is
simultaneously empirical and conceptual. It is deployed for the primitive
concepts—Being, Universe and so on; and it is used in developing the concept
of Logic. This situation is as it should be for the content concerns
knowledge of the Universe while method concerns knowledge of knowledge which
is also in the Universe and is therefore also content
The metaphysics provides an approach to vast stretches of knowledge
of Being—Logic. However, this is subject to limitations (1) for limited form
(being) conceptual formulation of knowledge of All Being under Logic is a
process in being and knowing without end (2) when the Logic informs us of the
existence of some state it still remains to discover or realize that state
Within the received paradigm of a culture including its
empirical and symbolic sciences, method may be divided into disjoint (a)
creative and rather private discovery (b) critical, confirming and rather
public justification. At the edges however this breaks down. Criticism and
creation become interwoven. In the details and beyond the level of a given
discipline creation and criticism occur in sequence. Further, some
internalized critical attitude enhances creation; and creation is required in
the discovery of method
The Universal metaphysics frames the Universe and,
particularly, the disciplines and their methods
From adaptation the methods of the disciplines are ‘good
enough’; the Universal Metaphysics shows that such methods may approach
contextual perfection; they combine with the metaphysics to constitute broad
classes of practical and of perfect knowledge; the join may be called applied
metaphysics
The metaphysics reveals one dimension, depth, in which
perfection is given and another dimension, breadth, which is ever open, never
fully subject to method where, even when one discipline is ‘disciplined’
other disciplines, new regions of Being, open up
The ‘method’ emphasizes intelligent engagement—some of
whose lineaments are suggested above and below
Growth of individuals and civilization and of
civilizations in connection and communication across the Universe in ultimate
realization is given
Intelligent action applied recursively, therefore
holistically and analytically, entails enjoyment and effectiveness of
realization
Intelligence is not limited to conscious cognition but
includes all modes of conscious and unconscious psyche, each separately but
also integrated—i.e., in reflexive and synthetic interaction. The
unconscious, the imaginative, the intuitive, and catalysts of psyche suggest,
reveal, and create paths; conscious thought and action realize the paths,
e.g. give them substance and permanence; and the conscious and unconscious
join in continuing realization
Attitude—Conservatism and Liberalism
The attitude of conservatism reflects accomplishment and
limitations of culture and the individual. Without these limits received
tradition would not be necessary. Because of the limits tradition and
authority born of tradition have value which conservatism values more than
individual initiative. Conservatism naturally emphasizes learning from a
teacher
The attitude of liberalism reflects the facts that
contexts change, that opportunity for realization is ever open, and that
despite limits there are true abilities. Liberalism naturally reflects
learning from experience
The way will combine conservative and liberal approaches.
We use the received elements as well as intelligence and experience in
realization. That we are learning while realizing results in content (way as
method) and method (empirical-rational-experimental development of ways)
The Elements of the Ways
Received ways include some of the following
elements—metaphysics, psychology, mindfulness and morals, practice and
practice-in-action, retreat and return, catalysts
Metaphysics refers to ultimate, mediate, and proximate
realms. Psychology is embedded in metaphysics—i.e. in the body, in nature and
culture—and thus for example the sensory modalities and language and freedom
in balance with determinate elements
Integration
The Universal Metaphysics including an associated
psychology also suggest ways (see Journey in
Being-Essential.html-Psychology)
These ways and the received ways will be integrated by
analysis and subsequent synthesis via reason and experiment—empirical
trial—under the Universal Metaphysics and its psychology
The Way
The Way of realization, a part of Logic, is experimental
in ideas and action
It is—best as—an amalgam of traditional ways (valid parts
of ancient through modern disciplines and disciplined activities, e.g.
technology, exploration, and yoga) and experiments in ideas and
transformation illuminated and directed under the Universal Metaphysics
Traditional presentations tend
to present as if whole; they suppress the experimental character of the
process; they suggest their realization as the realization
This is not meant to suggest
that traditional ways are without value or validity. However, since the
disciplines evolve with a culture what has validity—local or more than
local—is not always apparent. Adaptation and integration must therefore
include experiment
The elements of the
received ways, may include a metaphysics—view of the universe, the world,
society and civilization, morals and values, individual (body, mind, spirit),
and a way or prescription. Not all ways include all elements. The Buddha eschewed
metaphysics. Science develops understanding but is not thought of as a way of
life
A typical way, based in
its metaphysics, of living-transcendence includes prescribed practice and
practice in action, endeavors—e.g. the Beyul journey-pilgrimage of Tibetan
Buddhism
The Way incorporates
elements of ways—i.e., method; and Method—the growth of ways
I will tentatively call the
way Yoga. This is because the root Sanskrit meaning of ‘yoga’ is ‘yoke’ or
‘to unite’. One of the connotations of yoga is union with the ultimate… or
the way of union. Every discipline concerns going beyond the static and the
immediate even if this is only improving the immediate. While this is my
source, it does not dictate meaning. I choose the word ‘Yoga’ to denote ‘The
Way’ (a braid from one perspective, separate threads from another, and braid
making from a third perspective). There is no intent to displace specific
meanings or authority or to affirm them. Etymology does not determine use;
past use does not determine eternity or authority
The following defines A Minimal Program of
Experiments in Realization
Ideas and transformation (action)—the modes of endeavor
and realization—are essential to realization. Realization is impossible
without ideas and incomplete without transformation. These define the
essential phases
Ideas and thought constitute the first
essential phase. The metaphysics is its main result; and the metaphysics is
central in defining and illuminating the journey. Metaphysical content
centers on foundation review, development, cross-application with and among
disciplines and endeavors
Transformation of Being is the second
essential phase. The approach begins with standard systems which it develops
and deploys in interaction with the Universal metaphysics. It analyses the
standard systems—metaphysics and ways—into practices and practices in action,
and catalysts. It experiments with these eclectically, toward incremental and
step realization; this naturally includes learning—and synthesis and
evolution of systems; the process is illuminated by the Universal
Metaphysics. It proceeds everywhen—in the present, i.e. in inspiration and
pain (pain is inspiration) and in the conceptual future; and everywhere—at
home, in culture, and nature; and learning, change and synthesis of approach
I choose two secondary and supplementary phases as
follows
Development of artifactual Being—organic,
mechanical and symbolic—to assist understanding, implementing, and
complementing transformation
Understanding and deployment of civilization as a
vehicle of realization is the second complementary phase. This
phase is one of community and charismatic action and sharing. The approach
requires openness to concepts and processes of civilization and destiny. This
openness is essential from local indeterminism and the need to balance
conservatism and liberalism; and from guiles of utopia. In realization
Civilization is the matrix of civilizations across the Universe—a pictorial
analog to islands superficially separate, connected in the deep. Modes of
approach include those of civilization itself—of culture, immersion, and
participation; an approach that cultivates organic adaptive community; and an
instrumental approach to Being from science and technology
The content of the ideas emphasizes
knowledge of All Being—the metaphysics and Method or Way; it includes
knowledge of disciplines and methods both formal-explicit and informal-tacit.
The idea of method includes transformation of implicit to explicit knowledge
The process of the ideas is that of development
of content and method. In specific situations a systems of ideas and their
approaches separate out from general action. This separation is not universal
over all ideation
The method(s) for systems of ideas include
abstraction, naming of givens, analysis and synthesis of meaning. These
activities have an obvious conceptual component. However in abstraction from
experience and in analysis of the relation between concept and object it is
also empirical. In the synthesis of meaning it is simultaneously conceptual,
empirical, and experimental. At the edges ideas and action cannot be
separated. Ideas are not only verified but completed in action, i.e. in
immersion and participation. Because discovery is endless (for finite form)
all science of the future will encompass immersion and participation
The ‘vehicle’ of transformation is the
individual—body and person
Objectives of individual transformation are
determined and illuminated by the metaphysics—the ultimate ideal or aim is
universal identity, the immediate is being in the present as ground and being
in process toward the ultimate
Analysis and synthesis of transformation begins
with standard systems which it develops and deploys in interaction with the
Universal metaphysics. It analyses the standard systems—metaphysics and
ways—into practices, practices in action, and catalysts. It experiments with
these eclectically, toward incremental and step realization; this naturally
includes learning—and synthesis and evolution of systems; the process is
illuminated by and interactive with the Universal Metaphysics. It proceeds
everywhen—in the present, i.e. in inspiration and pain (pain is inspiration)
and in the conceptual future; and everywhere—at home, in culture, and nature;
and learning, change and synthesis of approach
A practice that emphasizes everyday and home
is as follows. The practice is meditation for centering, focus, reflection on
means and objectives. Action—presence, accept anxiety and doubt, focus
on care and goal, charisma
A practice that emphasizes nature and presence in
nature is as follows. It begins with presence in nature as
essential to opening up to its way, meaning, and inspiration. Specific
practices will be catalyst—risk, exertion, isolation, and nature presence. Action—deploy
mind-body toward ground-ultimate in presence of nature which is inspiration,
gateway, to the ultimate and ultimate
Here is a moral practice and action—it is
first, right thought and action in the present and toward the ultimate; and
second, setting up of and presence to opportunity
Limited form is not complete in itself. Civilization is
one natural vehicle. Charisma and its development merge individual and group
Objectives of transformation—preliminary
and final—are as follows. (1) Work toward reflexive defining and realizing
potential of this civilization (2) Explore and realize setup for individual
expression (3) Search for and communication with other civilization and, in
parallel with the third item (4) Population of the Universe
Approaches to transformation will include
the following. (1) Focus on civilization as such—definition,
potential; charisma and communication; science (social, e.g.
political-economic), participation, and immersion. (2) Focus on organic
Being—transformations of the individual. (3) Deployment of artifact
perhaps emphasizing science and technology and investigating cosmology, life
as information, technology of space travel and population of organic and
information modes
An Institute—I have long had an interest
in founding a research group dedicate to the goals of the journey. There
would be workers in relevant fields. The common purpose would be the goals of
this program. In addition to special interests, general interest, cross
communication, and synthesis would be required. The ideal would be that every
worker would be a generalist and a specialist. Years ago I wrote a plan and estimated
a budget at Institute.xls; this needs much change
for in its original version the emphases were modern, secular, and academic.
The original emphasis is now one emphasis. Older traditions are now important
for their suggestive character and understanding of psyche and a world
outside the secular (the older views may be incorrect in their picture of
that world but are correct in thinking that there is such a world). Further,
the metaphysics of the narrative introduces a new and encompassing
perspective
An artifact is a construction. It may be
organic—bio-physical—andor symbolic. An artifact may be stand-alone or
symbiotically integral with (human) being. This section details aspects of
science and technology in transformation of individual and civilization
Objectives—understand sustained Being;
build artifacts that will populate the Universe with soul andor assist
(human) being in population
Study and Research—Develop and
assimilate source material from cognitive science and related material
(AI and artificial life or ALife, robotics, adaptive and self-replicating
systems, ontology, physical eschatology, theology, cognitive science,
computation and information theory...) Develop concepts (theory) in
relation to the objective
Design and Development—Systems may
be symbolic including computational, mechanical, and mixed. Approaches
may include design, fabrication, experiment (systematic and ad hoc or
‘tinkering’), and adaptation
1. Ways.
Design ® Action ® Learning and modification of Ideas, Ways,
Transformation approaches ® Ongoing
review (implicit in ways)
2.
Aspects of Being—sequence. Individual—fall
2012. Proceed sequentially and in parallel as groundwork is adequate ® Civilization ® Artifact (interactions are three-way)
Way®
Place
Time
¯
|
Metaphysics / Psychology /
|
Mindfulness and morals
|
Practice and practice-in-action
|
Retreat and return
|
Catalysts
|
Method—i.e. analysis-synthesis
|
Transformation of Being Emphasizing the Individual
and Community
|
Everywhere
Everywhen
|
Reflect, experiment
|
Attitude, care, expression and caring
Dedication, affirmation
|
Physical and meditative Yoga—center, emptiness-vision, focus, review
Presence through ego and physical distraction
|
Dialog—
conversation and learning
|
Practice
Exercise—nature—general and therapy
|
Review
|
Home, town, nature, exercise
Immediate
|
Write
|
Contribute ®
|
Routine
Chores—Thursday
Diet
|
|
Honesty
Quiet reflection
|
|
Culture—milieu, order / chaos, pub speaking and interaction,
others—being, care, charisma
Immediate
|
Model universe
Milieu of metaphysics
Process
|
Deriving value and sharing metaphysics and implied value
Care and sharing
|
Initiative
Moral behavior
Abandon
|
Travel—intellectual, spiritual (e.g. bike tour), and other cultural
destinations—learning and interaction
|
Exposure to anxiety
Public speaking
Inspiration
Charisma
|
|
Nature
Immediate-2013…
|
Gateway and ground
|
Dedication
|
Presence and awareness
Climbing, x-country, exploration
|
Extended immersion
Travel
|
Fasting, isolation, inaction
Exertion, exposure
|
|
Travel
Immediate-2013…
|
‘Journey’ metaphor
|
Open mindedness and sharing
|
Being in the moment
|
Exploration
|
Risk
|
|
Dying and illness
Be prepared
|
Horizon / gateway
Telescope ambition
|
Advance directive
Self awareness
Care / share
|
Meditate on death; relation between transience & wholeness
|
Meditate on and prepare for after death
|
Acceptance
‘Near’ death
|
|
Transformation of Being—Civilization and Artifact
|
Civilization
2013-2014…
|
Matrix of community and communication
|
Perception and theory
|
Meditate on past and future lives
|
Individual transformation; sharing
|
Communication and charisma
Shared endeavor, research group—Institute
|
|
Artifact
2013-2014…
|
Ontology, cosmology, AI/ALife, robotics, cognitive science
|
Deploy as independent, as adjunct, and as symbiotic
|
Research, Design, and Development
|
Build, experiment, learn
|
Use
Shared endeavor, research group—Institute
|
|
|